Documentación y descripción lingüística
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11106976Palabras clave:
documentación lingüística, descripción lingüísticaResumen
Este capítulo presenta una introducción básica a la documentación y descripción lingüística. La primera sección introduce el concepto de documentación lingüística con el objetivo general de definirla. La segunda sección describe los métodos de documentación. La tercera sección resume la relación entre la descripción, documentación y la tipología o lingüística comparativa.
Referencias
Anderson, S. (1985). Inflectional morphology. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (Volume III): Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 151-201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, S. R. (2005). Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bickel, B. (2007). Typology in the 21st century: major current developments. Linguistic Typology, 11, 239-251.
Bickel, B. (2010). Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In I. Bril (Ed.), Clause Linking and Clause Hierarchy (pp. 51-104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bickel, B. (2011). Multivariate typology and field linguistics: a case study on detransitivization in Kiranti (Sino-Tibetan). (A. K. Peter, B. Oliver, N. David, & M. Lutz, Eds.) Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 3, 3, 3-13.
Bickel, B. (2015). Distributional typology: statistical inquiries into the dynamics of linguistic diversity. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 901-923). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bickel, B., & Nichols, J. (2002). Autotypologizing Databases and their Use in Fieldwork. In P. Austin, D. Helen, & P. Wittenburg (Eds.), Proceedings of the International LREC Workshop on Resources and Tols in Field Linguistics. Nijmegen: ISLE and DOBES.
Bickel, B., & Zuñiga, F. (2017). The ‘word’ in polysynthetic languages: phonological and syntactic challenges. In M. Fortascue, M. Mithun, & N. Evans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis (pp. 158-186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bochnak, R. M., & Matthewson, L. (Eds.). (2015). Methodologies in Semantic Fieldwork. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bohnemeyer, J. (2015). A Practical Epistemology for Semantic Elicitation in the Field and Elsewhere. In R. M. Bochnak, & L. Matthewson (Eds.), Methodologies in Semantic Fieldwork (pp. 13-46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bohnemeyer, J., Bowerman, M., & Brown, P. (2001). Cut and break clips. In S. C. Levinson, & N. Enfield (Eds.), Manual for the field season 2001 (pp. 90-96). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Bond, O. (2019). Canonical Typology. In J. Audring, & F. Masini (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory.
Bowerman, M., & Pederson, E. (1992). Topological relations picture series. In S. C. Levinson (Ed.), Space stimuli kit 1.2. Nijmegan: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Bowern, C. (2008). Linguistic Fieldwork: A Practical Guide. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Brody, J. (1986). Repetition as a Rhetorical and Conversational Device in Tojolabal (Mayan). International Journal of American Linguistics, 52(3), 255-274.
Burton, S., & Matthewson, L. (2015). Targeted Construction Storyboards in Semantic Fieldwork. In B. R. M, & L. Matthewson (Eds.), Methodologies in Semantic Fieldwork (pp. 135-156). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bybee, J. P. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cable, S. (2013). Beyond the past, present, and future: towrds the semantics of ‘graded tense’ in Gĩkũyũ. Natural Language Semantics, 21, 219-276.
Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal hygiene: The politics of language. London: Routledge.
Candea, M. (2018). Comparison in Anthropology: The impossible method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carlucci, A. (2015). Gramsci and Languages: Unification, Diversity, Hegemony. Chicago: Haymarket.
Chelliah, S. L., & De Reuse, W. (2011). Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork. London: Springer.
Comrie, B., Haspelmath, M., & Bickel, B. (2008). Leipzip glossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. Retrieved from Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Department of Linguistics: https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php
Eagleton, T. (2008). Literary Theory: An introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Eckert, P. (2018). meaning and Linguistic Variation: The Third Wave in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Epps, P. (2010). Linguistic Typology and Language Documentation. In J. J. Song (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Epps, P. L., Webster, A. K., & Woodbury, A. C. (2017). A Holistic Humanities of Speaking: Franz Boas and the Continuing Centrality of Texts. International Journal of American Linguistics, 83(1), 41-78.
Evans, N. J. (Ed.). (2002). Ethnosyntax: Explorations in Grammar and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guillaume, A. (2006). La catégorie du mouvement associe en cavineña: Apport à une typologie de l’encodage du mouvement et de la trajectoire. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris.
Guillaume, A. (2016). Associated motion in South America: Typological and areal perspectives. Linguistic Typology, 20(1), 81-177.
Guillaume, A. (forthcoming). Takanan languages. In P. Epps, & L. Michael (Eds.), Amazonian Languages. An International Handbook. De Gruyter Mouton.
Guillaume, A., & Koch, H. (This volume, chapter 1). Associated Motion as a grammatical category in linguistic typology.
Hanks, W., & Severi, C. (2014). Translating worlds: The epistemological space of translation. Hua: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(2), 1-16.
Haspelmath, M. (2010). Framework-free grammatical theory. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammatical analysis (pp. 341-365). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, M. (2020). The structural uniqueness of languages and the value of comparison for language description. Asian Languages and Linguistics.
Hellwig, B. V., Hulsbosch, M., Somasundaram, A., Tacchetti, M., & Geerts, J. (2020). ELAN - Linguistic Annotator, version 5.9. Nijmegen: The Language Archive, MPI for Psycholinguistics. Retrieved from https://www.mpi.nl/corpus/manuals/manual-elan.pdf
Henke, R. E., & Berez-Kroeker, A. L. (2016). A Brief History of Archiving in Language Documentation with an Annotated Bibliography. Language Documentation and Conversation, 10, 411-457.
Himmelmann, N. P. (1998). Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics, 6, 161-195.
Himmelmann, N. P. (2006). Language documentation: What it is and what is it good for? In J. Gippert, N. P. Himmelman, & U. Mosel (Eds.), Essentials of language documentation (pp. 1-30). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Himmelmann, N. P. (2012). Linguistic Data Types and the Interface between Language Documentation and Description. Language Documentation and Conservation, 6, 187-207.
Lahaussois, A., & Vuillermet, M. (2019). Methodological Tools for Linguistic Description and Typology. Language Documentation & Conservation, 16.
Lehmann, C. (2001). Language documentation: a program. In W. Bisang (Ed.), Aspects of typology and universals (pp. 83-97). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Margetts, A., & Margetts, A. (2012). Audio and Video Recording Techniques for Linguistic Research. In N. Thieberger (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork (pp. 13-54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, L. (2000). Parallelism and the Spontaneous Ritualization of ordinary talk: Three Mocho Friends Discuss a Volcano. In K. Sammons, & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Translating native Latin American verbal art: ethnopoetics and ethnography of speaking (pp. 104-124). Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Matthewson, L. (2004). On the Methoodology of Semantic Fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics, 70(4).
Mithun, M. (2001). Who shapes the record: the speaker and the linguist. In P. Newman, & M. Ratliff (Eds.), Linguistic Fieldwork: Essays on the Practice Empirical Linguistic Research (pp. 34-54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prost, G. (1965). Chácobo. In Gramáticas estructurales de lenguas bolivianas II (pp. 1-130). Riberalta: ILV.
Prost, G. (1967). Chacobo. In E. Mattseon (Ed.), Bolivian Indian Grammars 1 (Summer Institute of Linguistics International Publications in Linguistics 16). Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics of the University of Oklahoma.
Seyfeddinipur, M. (2011). Reasons for Documenting Gestures and Suggestions for How to Go About It. In N. Thieberger (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tallman, A. J. (2018a). A Grammar of Chácobo, a southern Pano language of the northern Bolivian Amazon. University of Texas at Austin.
Tallman, A. J. (2018b). There are no special clitics in Chácobo (Pano). In N. Webber (Ed.), Workshop on the Structure and Constituency in Languages of the Americas 21 (pp. 194-209). Vancouver: Unviersity of British Colombia Working Papers in Linguistics 26.
Tallman, A. J. (2020). An ethnographically based linguistic documentation of Araona: A Takanan language of Bolivia. Retrieved from https://elar.soas.ac.uk/Collection/MPI1207738
Tallman, A. J. (2020). Associated motion and posture in Araona (Takana). Atelier Typologie Semantique. Lyon: Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage (24th of January 2020).
Tallman, A. J. (2020). Beyond grammatical and phonological words. Language and Linguistics Compass, e12364. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12364
Tallman, A. J. (2020). Constituency and coincidence in Chácobo (Pano). Studies in Language.
Tallman, A. J. (forthcoming). Associated motion in Chácobo (Pano) in typological perspective. In A. Guillaume, & H. Koch (Eds.), Associated Motion. Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Typology (EALT). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tallman, A. J., & Elías-Ulloa, J. (2020). The acoustic correlates of tone and stress in Chácobo. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147, 3028-2042.
Tallman, A. J., & Stout, T. (2016). The perfect in Chácobo in cross-linguistic perspective. In T. Bui, & R.-R. Ivan (Eds.), SULA 9: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on the Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas. University of California, Santa Cruz.
Tallman, A. J., & Stout, T. (2018). Tense and temporal remoteness in Chácobo (Pano). In M. Keough, N. Weber, A. Anghelescu, S. Chen, E. Guntly, K. Johnson, . . . O. Tkachman (Ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop on the Structure and Constituency in the Languages of the Americas 21 (pp. 210-224). Montreal: University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics 46.
Tedlock, D. (1977). Toward an Oral Poetics. New Literary History, 8(3), 507-519. Tedlock, D. (1983). The spoken word and the work of interpretation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Uriagereka, J. (1998). Rhyme and Reason. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Valle, D. (2017). Grammar and Information Structure of Kakataibo. University of Texas at Austin.
Vuillermet, M. (2012). A Grammar of Ese Ejja, A Takanan language of the Bolivian Amazon. Lyon: PhD thesis, l’Université Lumière Lyon 2.
Vuillermet, M. (2013). Associated Motion Elicitation Kit (Version 7). Linguistic Department, UC Berkeley.
Vuillermet, M. a. (2013 ms). A hunting story ~ Yendo a cazar: A visual stimulus for eliciting constructions that associate motion with other events. Department of Linguistics, UC Berkeley.
Webster, A. K. (2008). Running Again, Roasting Again, Touching Again: On Repetition, Heightened Affective Expressivity, and the Utility of the Notion of Linguaculture in Navajo and Beyond. The Journal of American Folklore, 121(482), 441-472.
Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Woodbury, A. C. (2003). Defining Documentary Linguistics. Language Documentation and Description, 1, 35-51.
Woodbury, A. C. (2007). On thick translation in linguistic documentation. Language Documentation and Description, 4, 120-135.
Zariquiey, R. (2018). A Grammar of Kakataibo. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
